| COMIC
TITLE |
|
When this one went to press, an
editor at EGM changed the phrase "princess underwear" to "princess' underwear,"
with a possessive apostrophe. I contend that my version is correct; after
all, if a duck were wearing pants tailored exclusively to him (as
one must assume a princess' undergarments are), they would be justifiably
considered "duck pants," rather than merely "duck's pants." |
|
