ARCHIVE   JOURNAL   FORUM   CONTACT   STORE

HSU AND CHAN

MONDAY. 07/02/07 THE MUMMY'S TOOTH #86

RATATOUILLE

, if I may be so bold as to continue straight from the subject line, was excellent.

It's possible -- I'm still figuring it up -- that I liked 'Ratatouille' even more than 'The Incredibles.' And I loved 'The Incredibles' -- I just didn't like the character of 'Syndrome' at all. Never make your ultimate villain look like the kid who kicked the back of your seat on the school bus, that should be the lesson to all aspiring designers.

But -- 'Ratatouille' -- and no, it does not get easier to spell the more you type it -- it's a very different kind of film, possibly even more mature-themed than 'The Incredibles.' I realize that's a relative term in the realm of family films, but this one definitely feels more real-world.

"Family films." Yeesh. That's been code for "Wretched, insipid kids' movies" for so long that merely designating a movie as such these days is enough to pre-emptively knock a star off the review. They don't HAVE to be stupid -- it's our fault for letting so many bad ones through.

To get back on-subject, though, I've heard many a person saying they're not particularly interested in seeing this one. I'm here to tell you that you'll be doing yourself a grave disservice if you do not. I admit the advertising has been terribly lackluster, and I only saw it, myself, on virtue of Brad Bird's direction; the trailers would have you believe it's a wise-cracking talking animal movie, which is about as enthralling a concept, these days, as, well, a movie about wise-cracking talking animals.

It rises well above, however. For a start, it's only about 25% a talking animal movie. The rest is distinctly human-world-centric, with Remy, the rat, acting in a buddy role -- and not talking. Rats talk only to other rats; to people, they squeak. Easy enough to get into.

Despite what you may have seen, it's not a paen to gourmet food or even the restaurant industry -- it's more a tale of an artist's passion for his art, and if that sounds pretentious, well, at least it's still a rat we're talking about. It's hard to quantify what made it so good -- the animation's much more realistic, this time, compared to the zips and pops of Pixar's other features. The visuals -- seriously, this time, they're freaking gorgeous. It's a film that'll make you want to see Paris, and the imagery will stay with you long after you're standing in the middle of Europe's most famous open sewer, realizing you've been hoodwinked. When video games look like that, we'll be seeing some SERIOUS Vitamin D deficiency.

So, seriously, it's got my highest recommendation, you've got no excuse for not seeing it, and if you don't, I'll hate you. Indeed, just as I have nothing but the deepest contempt for THIS generally-favorable review from "Entertainment Weekly" (He gave it a 'B').

Despite spectacularly missing the message of the film, he also throws in this winner of a line -- "The lack of celebrity voices is a major drawback, since Remy ends up with very little personality. Contrast him with, say, the bad-boy Owen Wilson speedster in Cars, and you're seeing the difference between a hero with spice and a bland one who happens to know where the spice rack is."

I hope you'll all join me in noting that, in our good and informed opinion, this man is a pathetic moron, suitable only for chiseling grime out of convention-center toilets or working in the deepest mines. A harsh price for a dumb statement, but my hand has been forced. Yes, that's exactly what I was thinking as I was entranced by this wonderful movie -- This thing needs Owen Wilson! Better yet, Robin Williams! No, Mike Meyers! If he can do a French accent as well as he can do a Scottish one, we'll only be painfully aware that he's Canadian 35% of the time!

I recognized two voices in this -- Brad Garrett, and Peter O'Toole. Neither of 'em are on Hollywood's A-list, but both do a bang-up job, and at no point did I stop and think, "You know, this virtual puppet is being voiced by TV's Brad Garrett." In other words -- I was WATCHING the MOVIE. I didn't recognize any of the other actors in the credits. They all did a fine job.

My feeling is -- and maybe I'm wrong -- celebrity voices are tossed into lousy CG kids' movies for benefit of the parents. Nine-year-olds might well recognize a celebrity's voice when it's coming from a penguin's mouth, but seriously -- kids aren't a hard sell on these movies, which is why we let so many of them suck. I LIKED that I didn't recognize most of the actors -- for once, a major film company decided to show me something new. They did a great job.

Seriously, a great job. If you disagree with me, there's room in the mines.

Go see "Ratatouille."

Norm's Link-o-th'-Moment:
Drew's Script-O-Rama
Home of the original, better "Day of the Dead" script!

      SEE NORM'S FULL, HARROWING JOURNAL HERE!      

ARCHIVE UPDATED!

Check out Hsu and Arnie in an EGM reprint, "Wrested Peace," in the archive!

All content copyright 2007 (or earlier-like) Jeremy "Norm" Scott, all rights reserved.